Archive for the ‘Reviews’ Category

Silent House

Posted: July 24, 2012 by Jenny Dreadful in Film, Reviews

Silent House (2011), the American remake of the spooky La Casa Muda (2010), is now available on DVD and Blu-Ray.  I reviewed the film for Cinedelphia back in March when it was still on the big screen. I thought I should go ahead and repost it now that readers who missed it in theaters have a chance to check it out at home. (Link to original article here.)

________________________________________

Silent House (2011), starring the talented Elizabeth Olsen, is yet another English-language remake of a recent foreign film.  In this case, Chris Kentis of Open Water fame and producer Laura Lau tackle a spooky low-budget effort from Uruguay featuring a very clever gimmick.  La Casa Muda (2010), in the tradition of Hitchcock’s Rope, is reportedly the first horror film shot in a single take.  Not unlike the found-footage approach, this means exploring a creepy house, hiding in the dark, and unraveling a disturbing mystery for nearly 90 minutes in real-time.

As we begin, the young female protagonist is assisting her father with the daunting task of fixing up an old family home.  Soon after settling into the deteriorating house, she is alarmed by mysterious noises coming from within the building.  Her father leaves to investigate and sooth her fears, but he doesn’t return.  She grabs a lantern and away we go.  Although the slow pace of the original isn’t for everyone, it’s fascinating from a technical perspective alone.  How did they line up that shot so perfectly?  Were the actors and FX professionals hiding around every corner like a haunted attraction?  How did the cameraman squeeze into that space?  My main concern going into the screening for Silent House was whether we would see an interesting spin on the original material or a shallow copy existing for no reason other than lazy Americans refusing to read.

In many ways, it is the same film with an American flavor, but it does an admirable job with filling in some plot holes and establishing plausibility that the original’s setup was sorely lacking.  Olsen, appearing before her well-received role in Martha Marcy May Marlene, is excellent.  Since we must spend the majority of the film’s screen-time looking into and through her eyes, her ability to carry the film and sell the raw emotions experienced by her character is appreciated.  Like the original, spending every minute of the film with the heroine builds tension as you discover each strange new piece of the puzzle together.  The filmmakers admit to using several cuts, but the ambitious camera work documenting her journey is edited together smoothly and effectively.

As we reach the climax, the remake injects some new life into the story with some hallucinogenic nightmare imagery.  I enjoyed these moments as a horror fan, but the heavier hand ultimately leads to a frustrating reveal.  The conclusions of the two films play out in essentially the same way (and both are quite polarizing), but unfortunately… predictably… the American version handles the big conclusion with a laughably blunt-force good and evil approach and the original’s uncomfortable nuances of morality are lost.  Whether you’re experiencing the film on its own or in comparison, it’s a disappointing turn.

Overall, it’s a solid but completely unnecessary interpretation.  Those annoyed with the found-footage trend will likely find similar issues here with pacing, plot, and credibility, but patient fans of films about spooky dark houses should have a good time.

Take Shelter

Posted: July 11, 2012 by Jenny Dreadful in Film, Reviews

Not unlike Lars von Trier’s Melancholia, Jeff Nichols’ moody drama Take Shelter is a deliberately paced meditation on mental illness and the end of days. Although I would describe both films this same way to viewers unfamiliar with the material, Take Shelter explores the themes with a down-to-earth approach and—unless you live in a mansion on a sprawling estate complete with stables and ballroom—more relatable characters.

Our protagonist Curtis, played by Michael Shannon, is a blue-collar family-man with a challenging but near-idealic life. Curtis and his beautiful wife Samantha (Jessica Chastain) have to work hard to make ends meet and provide treatment for their hearing-impaired daughter, but things are looking up. Hopes are high. As storms roll in and interrupt his work routine, Curtis begins to struggle with disturbing apocalyptic visions.

Whether or not Take Shelter qualifies as a horror film may be up for debate, but these visually stunning sequences are deeply unsettling. The birds panic and weave unnatural patterns through the sky. Dark clouds gather. Rust-colored rain falls. The world around him turns to violence. These events haunt his dreams and he wakes in the throes of an anxiety attack almost nightly.

Well aware that schizophrenia runs in his family, Curtis tries to cope with both the certainty that his mind is turning against him and the nagging possibility that his fears are valid; that an apocalyptic storm really is on its way. Although he quietly seeks help through therapy and medication, he’s unable to keep these nightmares from affecting his actions or his family’s financial and social well-being. Most evident in his obsession with fixing up the property’s old storm shelter and an increasing sense of mistrust.

Saying much more about the plot would be a mistake. Is he losing his grip on reality? Is he seeing a glimpse of the future? That’s the question. If a two-hour running time and a slower pace aren’t a turnoff, you’ll just have to watch and discover the answers along with him. The patient viewer is rewarded with an affecting descent into uncertainty and terror from Shannon, creepy and beautiful cinematography, and a very real sense of dread.

At the very least, it’s an excellent companion piece to Melancholia if you want a pretty and depressing double feature.

Supershark!

Posted: July 11, 2012 by StayFrosty in Film, Reviews

It’s a touching story full of deep meaning, an intense love triangle and metaphors on the brevity of human life…oh wait, I must have been thinking of something else.  This is SUPERSHARK!

Since movies like Birdemic and anything by The Asylum has risen in popularity, it seems like many companies are jumping on the so bad it’s (hopefully) good bandwagon.  And while Supershark doesn’t quite make it to the spic standards of a Birdemic quality movie, it still sort of works.  Side note – I can’t believe I just put the words “Birdemic” and”quality” in the same sentence.

It’s all well and good until an offshore drilling team accidentally breaks through some prehistoric ice and releases a gigantic monster shark.  But this isn’t just any old monster shark – this supershark can fly AND it can walk on land using its front fins to propel it along!  Read this sentence again.  Fly and walk on land.  This movie should be amazing.  Of course, the shark was let loose by an evil oil company using evil chemicals, fronted by its evil leader Wade (former Duke of Hazzard John Schneider, wishing he had a mustache to twirl…no, really) and must be stopped by a disgraced marine biologist Kat Carmichael (Sarah Lieving) with the help of boat captain Skipper Chuck (Tim Abell), looking like a cheap Michael Madsen knockoff.  Because you CAN”T CLOSE THE BEACHES!  Somewhere in this is DJ Dynomite Stevens (former Good Times actor Jimmie Walker), who doesn’t serve any point that I can see other than to make loud, strange commentary on an indoor bikini contest and wear a variety of wacky getups.   I won’t give away too many spoilers of what happens (though if you watch the trailer you already know this), but there may or may not be a tank robot vs. shark battle.

Any movie in this vein would do well to adhere to the Corman school of filmmaking, which (to paraphrase) is if you go around 5 minutes without showing the monster, that’s too long.  Supershark tries to keep this in mind, even going so far as to just introduce characters for a minute only to have them eaten up by the shark.  And almost no one is safe, even characters that seem set up to be main characters/final girls.

Whee!!!

There’s not much point in critiquing the acting, the FX or the cinematography, because that’s not what you watch these movies for.  You watch them for shark, shark and more shark.  All shark all the time.  Sharks eating all sorts of crazy stuff.  So that’s what I’ll review.  The shark does eat a bunch, but not as many giant or crazy things as I would have liked.  It’s called Supershark, and it can fly – FLY!  It should be eating spaceships or something.  The walking bit is a little exaggerated – more like limply hopping across the beach moving its two front flippers.  But the idea in general is fun, and there are a few major edifices removed from the beach.  For the most part, the movie operates as you would expect, and there’s a fairly good amount of shark.  But then again, I always want to see more shark in movies like this.

Most awkward photo shoot ever.

And there’s a theme song, people.  A theme song.  With a funky bass line.  Seriously.

Look, I’m betting you already know if you’re going to watch this or not.  I knew I would be sitting down with my FGSG cohorts the day it came out, trying to guess how many minutes until the shark appeared (you don’t have to wait long).  Judged against others of its ilk, you could do worse than Supershark.

Prometheus

Posted: June 25, 2012 by crowbait in Film, Reviews

Ridley Scott returns to science fiction horror with a film that is in all but name a prequel to the famed Alien franchise that he first brought to life back in 1979.

When Scott decided to take on an a new Alien project he first had to contend with the franchise itself. The Alien property has been one of the most fiercely guarded and at the same time poorly used of the past four decades, with Fox eager to keep the license active but by showing no trust in the abilities of the directors, producers, or other creators to whom they lend it. Scott avoided the issue rather than confront it. Prometheus doesn’t use the exact language or visuals of the other films, creating a prequel with enough of its own style that it can reference the other Alien properties without being directly controlled by them. Concepts based on the work of Dan O’ Bannon and visual inspired by the work of H. R. Giger will be  familiar to any fan of the franchise are in the film but with enough changes to avoid legal entanglement.

Prometheus is a story of grand sci-fi concepts from its very beginning. The story covers the existential topics of creation, evolution, identity, ancestry, religious faith, and parentage. Concepts that were subtext in Alien or part of the unwinding narrative of Blade Runner are front and center, the big issues that motivate our protagonists. This is a change from the other films, which dealt with the same ideas but in a less grandiose and more common way, starting from the ground level of the common man . The space ship is still the home of a crew of working stiffs and the company is still a callous organization but the protagonists are explorers and investigators looking for answers to the questions of life and existence from the start. Stumbling across monsters and struggling to survive will come later.

Michael Fassbender as David

Michael Fassbender steals the show with his incredible performance as the android David. David’s very existence is a complicated web of contradictions. A machine told to act human despite the inability to be human and to carry out strict directives despite common sense or even possibility. It is a very difficult role, requiring a great deal of prowess to tie together all of the strange conflicts that make him a friend and companion in one second and an unfeeling pawn seconds later. Fassbender communicates David in a way that always implies that he knows more, or wants more than he is allowed to say and this enigmatic nature keeps him compelling even when other characters become more basic as the situation turns against them.

Most of the horror sequences in the film begin the second act as the situation turns against the explorers and the things that they have tampered with begin to tamper with them. In these scenes the creatures and people turn on one another and monsters stalk the survivors who are forced into more violent and dangerous actions to survive. The third act is where the struggle bursts out to become more action oriented, with chases and fights and the nobility of sacrifice bringing the film to its conclusion.

Noomi Rapace as Elizabeth Shaw

In Summary: It’s great to see how Scott was able to expand the ideas of the Alien universe outside the limitations of the previous films. Answering questions about the origin of the series as much as the “origin of the species.” Overall, it’s a fabulous film.

I do have a complaint in that the transition to the third act had me scratching my head a little. After some violent and exciting scenes and the big reveal of the Weyland mission, the characters seem to immediately forget those events, refusing to acknowledge the carnage and plunging right in to the oncoming disaster.

Silent Hill: Downpour

Posted: June 18, 2012 by crowbait in Games, Reviews

For many people summer means more free time. Vacation, school holiday and so forth. So what’s the best way to use that time? Certainly not by going outside. It’s hot out there; and much too bright. No, you’re better off staying in the shade and air-conditioning of your living room and catching up on all those video games that you didn’t have time to play yet.

That’s what I do.

Silent Hill: Downpour

Welcome back; but not welcome home.

The Silent Hill franchise is probably the most respected survival horror video game in the genre. Though it is still outdone in sales by the Resident Evil games, a series that has abandoned horror for spook-house action, Silent Hill is still favored as the horror game that stayed true to its roots and remained scary. The problem that the series has faced is that it was too good at what it set out to do and peaked too early. Silent Hill 2 was a perfect storm of horror elements: A likable but unreliable protagonist, an environment of creepiness and dread, supporting characters with believable motivations and well acted performances, the mother of all video game bogeymen, and a deep seated psychological element to the horror that slowly opened up to the players answering questions and asking new ones to lead us on.

How do you top an antagonist like that? Give him two knives?

Since then however, video game publisher Konami has tried again and again to recapture that lightning-in-a-bottle and met with responses of “Good effort, but not good enough.” Well, I can tell you that Downpour is definitely the best Silent Hill game I’ve played since 2. Still not as good or better than its venerable ancestor but it hit me in a way that the efforts of 4, Origins, Shattered Memories, and Homecoming did not.

The story of Downpour is the story of Murphy Pendelton, a prison convict on transfer to a new facility. What exactly he has done to deserve his incarceration is unsaid, though mentions of his murdered son and favors that he did for the corrupt prison guards are passed around in the opening scenes. Accompanying him to his new home is Anne Cunningham, a prison guard who seems to know a lot more about Murphy than anyone else.

On the road a thick fog blows in and it’s not long before the bus skids off the road into a ravine, killing the passengers and allowing Murphy the opportunity to escape. Anne has also pulled through however and she chases after Murphy, driving him through the forest and into the nearby resort town of Silent Hill.

I visited Silent Hill and all I got was this lousy T-shirt.
And dementia praecox.

Fog was an important part of the early Silent Hill games. Video game consoles at the time were very limited in the amount of detail that they could render onscreen at any time. Team Silent, the first developers of the franchise, saw this limitation and made it a feature, making the environment oppressive and claustrophobic by hiding most of the world outside the bubble of clear vision around the character. As consoles improved the mist effect was used less and the fans of the series came to lament the loss of one of the most threatening features of Silent Hill. Downpour, with its emphasis on rain and water brings the fog back in full force. Mist covers the streets and buildings meaning Murphy often has to stumble close to buildings before the features become clear, causing the confusion and terror of the earlier iterations.

Murphy must creep through the streets from dilapidated house to crumbling condemned building looking for a path through the partially demolished town and its road that end in chasms and sinkholes. Along the way he’ll have to solve bizarre puzzles that unlock doors, avoid the vicious monsters that embody his own guilt and fears, and scramble through a nightmare world, a parallel dimension of post-industrial architecture and torture traps that stitches the unstable world of Silent Hill together.

Start running. Then keep running.

One of the most interesting developments in the catalog of creatures that stalk through the town are the ghostly police cruisers. Old style cop cars with rusted panels and chugging engines will roll by in the foggy streets. If Murphy is caught out in the open when one rolls past it lets out a blurt of its siren. In response the sky darkens and the rain falls harder. More rain brings on more monsters and if Murphy can’t quickly find cover he will be overwhelmed by the gray skinned and sodden inhabitants of the town.

Though his journey leads to some beautiful and frightening set piece scenes, the puzzle solving mechanics of Downpour are still nonsensical and sometimes seem to be present just to be a distraction. Though there is the delightful scene in which Murphy must play out the script of a nursery school play to open the way through phantasmal ”Grandmother’s house,” there are also three apartments that require a hunt for lost objects. These simple wanderings through a single house have no apparent bearing on the outcome of the game, costing time and resources and offering no immediate reward.

Maneuvering Murphy through his environment may be frustrating to some. The early Silent Hill games had an archaic control scheme, with the character handling like a remote-controlled car and swinging weapons in a simple arc directly ahead. Other development teams have tried to update these controls, making the character move more freely and athletically and adding more features like weapons that will track a foe, the ability to sidestep and dodge attacks and combination strikes. Fans of the series have generally dismissed these “improvements” as the lack of control over the character made for an “everyman” feel, better suited to a character who was not a commando or space marine. Downpour turns the clock back a few iterations and limits Murphy’s movement abilities while attempting to keep the fluid and believable human motion of newer titles. The result is a mixed bag, with combating enemies sometimes being a cakewalk and at other times being a matter of attrition.

Vatra Games, the developers of this sequel have done an admirable job in cherry picking some of the best features of the previous sequels. The handling of firearms from Homecoming, the chase sequences of Shattered Memories, and the danger of the cheap and improvised weapons breaking after use from Origins. In a series with so much history behind it, it’s a much safer path to take rather than striking out on one’s own.

Sic ‘em!

While the retro features of the fog and the limited control scheme will please purists, they will also alienate the mainstream audience. Games have done more and more to streamline or even simplify the work a player must do and many are used to having brightly flashing arrows on the screen to direct their movements and flexible controls that let the character move like an athlete. It is these very limitations however that give the Silent Hill series its charm and keep the player scared by limiting the character’s agency. If Silent Hill is to stay true to its horror roots, it will have to always remain a cult classic.

It wouldn’t have been hard to miss Downpour as Konami did little to champion its release. The advantage to you now is that it will be relatively easy to find a cheap copy of the game for your console of choice. Go ahead, take a walk through the streets of Silent Hill. Make it your special place.

Dark Shadows

Posted: May 21, 2012 by Jenny Dreadful in Film, Reviews

This review was originally written for Cinedelphia. You can find that article here.

____________________________

My name is Jenny and I’m a “recovering goth.”  (Hi, Jenny.)  Like many weirdos my age, I don’t identify with subcultures much anymore and just dress and obsess as I please.  I did my time in black lipstick and cemeteries, though, and I still wear far too much eyeliner.  Why am I telling you about the angsty fashion of my youth instead of getting on with this movie review?  It’s my way of telling my spooky friends out there that I get it.  I loved Burton too.  Beetlejuice, Edward Scissorhands, The Nightmare Before Christmas… his uniquely crafted world of both darkness and delight was magic once.

I think most of us can sadly agree that the present Burton formula…

  • An overly serious but comical Johnny Depp
  • A pretty but unhinged Helena Bonham Carter
  • An off-kilter score from Danny Elfman

… has become predictable and tired.  Between my growing disillusion with Burton’s work and my disdain for the industry’s addiction to remakes, I didn’t have high hopes for his latest offering, Dark Shadows, a comedic send-up of a long-running supernatural soap-opera from the 60s.  In fact, I expected it to be terrible.  It is with great hesitation and fear that I report my findings.  I laughed my ass off and had a fantastic time.

The original series, a gothic tale unfolding in a creepy mansion, went through many changes over the years.  Although no supernatural elements were originally present, the world of Dark Shadows was eventually inhabited by ghosts, witches, werewolves and, most prominently, a vampire named Barnabas Collins.  For years, the undead Collins (played by the late Jonathan Frid) stalked his family estate, schemed, and sought the rebirth of Josette, his long-lost love.  Confession time.  With all due respect to my elders and the charm of 60s media, I find watching this show to be terribly dull.  I tried.  From a distance, however, I can appreciate the atmosphere, melodrama and campy performances.  I gather that most fans of the cult program similarly enjoy it for occasional silliness as well as mysteries and monsters.  Those fans may find some amusement here in Tim Burton’s adaptation, which acknowledges the show’s goofier attributes and plays them for laughs.  Fans who take the show quite seriously, who want the property to be treated with somber respect, I have bad news for you.  You’ll be furious.

In the new film, Johnny Depp’s Barnabas escapes a coffin that has imprisoned him for almost 200 years (196 to be exact) and returns to Collinwood, his family home, in 1972.  The expected “fish out of water” jokes follow as this relic from the 1700′s tries to cope with the modern age and connect with his descendants (Michelle Pfeiffer, Chloe Grace Moretz, Jonny Lee Miller), but this isn’t the entire focus of the film as I’d feared.  He soon discovers that the competition crushing the Collins family business is none other than Angelique (Eva Green), the spiteful and powerful witch responsible for both his undead transformation and long underground captivity.  A sexy battle of wills, bloodsucking and other hijinks ensue.

Dark Shadows is surprisingly funny.  Featuring hilarious monster sex and other erotic exploits, the humor is unexpectedly raunchy too.  Despite Burton’s annoying tendency to use the same cast repeatedly, one has to admit that Depp’s deadpan delivery is always excellent.  It probably isn’t a shock that he looks great either.  All dreaminess aside, his costuming, makeup, and body-language reminiscent of classics like Nosferatu and Lugosi are sure to delight vampire fans with a sense of humor.  Even the color of the blood is a fun reference; the bright red paint seen so often in 70s horror classics (e.g., Hammer Horror, Argento).  Of course, the lavish sets, marvelous costume designs and beautiful vistas we’ve come to expect from Tim Burton are all present and accounted for, but it’s just window-dressing for a silly romp through stereotypical vampire country.

In classic Burton-style, however, the last act is confused and disappointing. Ridiculous subplots appear from nowhere and fall flat.  Too many ideas are shoehorned into the big climax.  He just wanted to do too much.  Even worse, you realize that the film expects you to actually care about the characters and their big romance at the end.  Not unlike a good buddy expecting a kiss after a fun day out, the results are unexpected and embarrassing.

I thought we were just having a good time, Burton.  Why do you have to make it awkward?

Despite my lack of enthusiasm once the credits rolled, I had a great time with Dark Shadows.  Fans enraged by the concept of having a good-natured laugh at the original show instead of playing it straight should keep a safe distance.  Anyone in the mood for some wacky vampire jokes could do much worse.  Without getting to look at Johnny Depp.

Absentia

Posted: April 17, 2012 by StayFrosty in Film, Reviews

Low budget filmmaking usually calls to mind (with some notable exceptions) poor CGI, fair to poor acting, and bland storylines we’ve seen a hundred times before.  And then there’s Absentia, a movie that takes the little money it has and runs with it, creating an effectively scary, well written and well shot film that Hollywood wishes it still understood.  Absentia proves that you don’t need millions of dollars to make a good movie.  The movie may be cheap, but the scares sure aren’t.

All of the people on this poster are right.

It’s hard for us to review this movie, which is why we’re skipping a synopsis.  We’d rather just say “Go watch this, it’s awesome!” and hope you’d believe us, mainly because we’re right.  Also, we don’t want to give anything away.  Here’s what we can say:

The movie’s use of focus is excellent.  Seriously, it’s pretty damn amazing.  This cannot be emphasized enough.  Without giving too much away, there’s an actor with some simple makeup who, through the use of focus, becomes terrifying.  The first encounter and a scene involving a closet are especially effective.  The use of focus is such a huge help in building the tension – keeping this figure just out of focus, highlighting that it isn’t a natural part of the world.  It amazed us that something so basic was made so creepy just through camera work.  And it’s not just the creepy parts.  The use of focus (keeping certain things in or out of focus) even in traditional scenes keeps the movie off-kilter, keeps you looking and keeps you guessing.

Just as commendable as the use of focus is the lack of stings and cheap scares.  We aren’t an easy group to freak out, but there were definitely some unsettling scenes and moments that got to us.  And extra points for making a difficult premise work without seeming forced.  It’s an interesting take on folklore that isn’t often explored in the genre – a new spin on the missing person mystery.

Any criticisms? There is one shot of CGI that’s a little questionable, but even that isn’t fully in focus and is done pretty quickly, so it’s a minor issue at best.  Really, there’s not much wrong with this movie.

Do we recommend?  Umm…have you been reading this blog lately?  We LOVE this movie!  Get it, see it, then come back here and tell us your thoughts!

Jenny: I agree with everything Frosty says above. I just wanted to add that, along with films like Insidious and Lake Mungo, this is a perfect film for the squeamish horror fan that craves fear and atmosphere without the gore or extreme violence.

See it. See it now.

The Cabin in the Woods

Posted: April 13, 2012 by Jenny Dreadful in Film, Reviews

*SPOILER FREE*

The Cabin in the Woods, a hilariously fun examination of the horror genre from Joss Whedon (Buffy, Firefly, The Avengers) and Drew Goddard (Cloverfield, Lost), finally hits theaters today following a painful three-year delay. Seeing a film shelved for so long is usually a sign of embarrassment and dubious quality, but the wait was due to financial difficulties at MGM and, luckily, Lionsgate picked up the film and saved the day.

Featuring Chris Hemsworth (ThorThe Avengers), Richard Jenkins (Let Me In, The Visitor), Bradley Whitford (The West Wing) and Fran Kranz* (Dollhouse, Mike Nichols’ Death of a Salesman) among others, Cabin in the Woods is a film about horror; criticizing and worshipping the genre in equal measure.

So, what’s the premise?  A group comprised of five horror movie stereotypes (the Slut, the Stoner, the Virgin, etc…) takes a road-trip and shacks up in a creepy old cabin in the woods to party. Something bad happens. The promos say “You think you know the story” and for good reason. We’ve all seen this movie a thousand times, right? This time is delightfully different.

You might find this review unsatisfying, but it’s for your own good. Don’t read anything. Don’t watch anything. Don’t listen to anyone who can’t be trusted with spoilers. Run from them. Defend yourself if they pursue. You just can’t talk about this film without ruining the fun surprises that make it such an entertaining ride.

At the risk of being accused of overhype… Ignore the press and just go see it. I laughed like a maniac for 95 minutes and can’t wait to do it again. It’s a genre geek’s dream. Whedon and horror fans especially… Just go.

*I was fortunate enough to sit down with Kranz this week and have a chat about the film. Look for this interview, coming soon, on Cinedelphia.

Bram Stoker’s Dracula

Posted: March 1, 2012 by crowbait in Film, Reviews

We’d like to revisit the romantic theme and discuss Francis Ford Coppola’s take on Dracula. 

Bram Stoker’s Dracula (1992) follows the classic plot we all know so well, but adds a significant twist. Dracula becomes a vampire to avenge the loss of his beloved wife and finds her reincarnated soul in our heroine Mina Harker. The result is an interesting mesh of vampire romance and Hammer-style sex and gore ultimately let down by uneven performances and plot confusion.

What I had forgotten over the years is how much this movie owes to Hammer horror.  In fact, if I didn’t know and you told me it was a Hammer movie, I might believe you.  From Lucy walking to meet Dracula in a flowing red nightdress to the imposing shape of Castle Dracula shrouded in fog, this is Hammer all the way.  It’s got all the staples, but ups the sexuality.  There’s no question that the vampire’s kiss relates to losing virginity or the awakening of sexuality (mainly female sexuality).  And there’s much more than just kissing involved.

If there is a major flaw, it’s in the uneven casting.  I know it’s beating a dead horse, but c’mon – Keanu Reeves?  That poor boy is so out of his element you almost feel bad for him.  You wonder why Mina would ever want to be with him when she could choose Gary Oldman instead.  Oldman, as Dracula, manages to convey his emotional torment and deep desire for Mina while still maintaining the monstrous aspects of the vampire.

And then there’s The Hopkins.  As Van Helsing, The Hopkins is everything Hammer’s Peter Cushing is not – brash, wild, probably slightly crazy, definitely more like Ahab than the refined but very tough hunter that Cushing gave us.  When you hire The Hopkins, you pretty much know what you’re in for, so I would assume Coppola wanted this madman performance.  And really, since everyone else is so restrained (or, in Keanu’s case, blank), you’re pretty happy when he comes along.

Jenny: Bram Stoker’s Dracula is incredibly over-the-top and stylized. With shadow puppets, animated maps, wild colors, goofy transitions and heavy symbolic imagery, it is the sexy and frightening union of art film and cartoon. For me, this is a positive trait because the rather heavy-handed approach is well-excuted and consistent.

It’s a good-looking film. With the exception of a few dated techniques, the effects are fantastic; often utilizing practical methods and referencing creepy moments from classics like Nosferatu. (long reaching shadow hands, the unbent rise from the coffin) The character designs are amazing too. Lucy in the crypt, the armored warrior Vlad, the count in his dark castle, even Mina’s dresses… I could write pages and pages about the makeup, hair and costuming alone. Luckily, I don’t have to. This book, which I had growing up, covers the subject (among others) in great detail.

Similar to our discussion about Interview with the Vampire, this is “my” vampire. The version of the monster that I grew up with and came to love. Romantic and violent. I do recommend Bram Stoker’s Dracula, but it’s not a flawless film and Dracula fans shouldn’t go in expecting an interpretation that’s true to the plot or flavor of the original book. Think of it as a bizarre reimagining rather than straight adaptation and be willing to laugh off a few silly accents and bad performances.

Love Bites – Day 5 – Blade

Posted: February 8, 2012 by crowbait in Film, Reviews

In the 90′s vampire films became much more than horror. Alongside the romantic and sympathetic attitude of Anne Rice’s Interview, Blade introduced the vampire action flick. Featuring Wesley Snipes as the half-human, half-vampire, finally, there was a vampire movie with a black lead that didn’t have “Blacula” in the title.

Based on a Marvel comic book character first introduced in the 70′s, Blade possesses the supernatural strength and speed of a vampire but is immune to most of their weaknesses like sunlight or garlic. Created when a vampire attacked his pregnant mother, Blade wages a war fighting to release humanity from the secret rule of the vampire masters. In the first film he is introduced through the eyes of Dr. Karen Jenson (N’Bushe Wright,) a doctor who is forced into the world of vampires and hunters when she is bitten by one of Blade’s quarry. Earning his acceptance with her stubborn refusal to hide on the sidelines, they discover a plot by vampire leader Deacon Frost (Stephen Dorff) to use vampiric magic to make himself a god. With the help of Whistler’s (Kris Kristofferson) anti-vampire weaponry and some martial arts throw-downs they face off against the vampire menace.

"Always bet on black."

Snipes played the role with a cool and hard-edged aplomb which, while suiting the film interpretation of the character, allowed him to be upstaged by the more entertaining Deacon Frost, or hilariously foul-mouthed Whistler. This is a sharp contrast from the Blade of his comic book appearances but is more in line in keeping with the stoic action anti-hero of the 90′s.

The new traditions of vampire cinema have continued through two decades now. With Blade sequels and television shows, Milla Jovovich in Ultraviolet, Daybreakers, and the Underworld series having just released its fourth film, the vampire as super hero is here to stay.